A Welfare Analysis of Universal Childcare: Lessons From a Canadian Reform (avec Luisa Carrer et Pierre-Loup Beauregard) Job Market Paper, soumis
CLEF Working Paper (juillet 2024), Dernière version
Prix : Meilleur Papier par un Jeune Chercheur 2024 (2e prix) du Canadian Labour Economics Forum
Couverture académique : childcarepolicy.net, Policy Impacts Library
Médias : New York Times, Le Devoir, Radio-Canada Ottawa, 98.5fm Montréal, 107.7fm Estrie, Zone Économie (Radio-Canada)
Veiling and the Economic Integration of Muslim Women in France (avec Antoine Jacquet)
Révision demandée au Canadian Journal of Economics
Document de travail
A Comment on Vulnerability and Clientelism (2022) (avec Hai Ma et Ardyn Nordstrom) dans Brodeur et al. (2025) "The Reproducibility and Robustness of Economics and Political Science", Révision demandée à Nature
Document de travail, Meta-analyse
Behind the Veil of Origin: Revisiting the Impacts of the French Headscarf Ban in Schools [Document de travail]
Intergenerational Transmission of Violence: Perpetration and Victimization (avec Sonia Bhalotra, N. Meltem Daysal, Mathias F. Jensen, and Thomas H. Jørgensen) [document de travail disponible sous peu]
Résumé : Does violence victimization get transmitted across generations? Using Danish register data spanning four decades, we provide the first empirical evidence on the cycle of victimization beyond small-scale surveys. We document that the intergenerational transmission is substantial for both victimization and crime. Even though victimization has received less attention, it emerges as nearly as consequential as violent offending. Transmission is proportionally stronger for daughters, reflecting their lower baseline risks combined with sizable parental effects. Maternal pathways, and especially mother–daughter victimization transmission, are particularly robust to differences in family traits. Direct exposure--especially to maternal victimization--plays a central role in perpetuating the cycle of violence across generations.
Are Climate Policies Marginal? A Welfare Evaluation of Environmental Reforms (avec Jean-François Fournel) [document de travail disponible sous peu]
Résumé : Which investments in climate protection should policymakers prioritize? We develop a framework that combines the Marginal Value of Public Funds (MVPF) with structural models of demand for green technologies to evaluate the welfare impact of non-marginal changes in environmental regulations. Our approach allows us to trace the MVPF over the full policy spectrum using counterfactual simulations. This contrasts with the sufficient statistics approach which relies on constant elasticities and a ``small policy changes'' assumption in the evaluation of the policy's effectiveness. We apply our methodology to the Canadian electric vehicle market, following Fournel (2025). We document important nonlinearities in the cost-effectiveness of the Canadian electric vehicle incentive programs: subsidies deliver substantial social returns on the first dollars spent, but the diminishing welfare gains make large subsidies inefficient. At the currently available subsidies, we estimate an MVPF of 0.8, which indicates that the policy does not generate a dollar-for-dollar return on investment.